The individual or group behind the alleged Tether attack may have been involved in a previous well-known hack in the bitcoin space.
Those behind the alleged theft of $31 million worth of Tether's US dollar-backed tokens were also involved in a high-profile hack two years ago, a cybersleuth has concluded from available blockchain data.
The company behind the dollar-backed cryptocurrency tether claimed Monday night that it had been robbed, sparking a new wave of speculation around the token, its backers and its alleged role in recent bitcoin market movements.
And, as might be expected, the availability of public blockchain data for the transactions involved led a number of observers online to trace them back in an attempt to find answers.
In posts on the r/bitcoin and r/cryptocurrency subreddits, a user going by the handle SpeedflyChris has linked the alleged Tether attack to the $5 million hack of Bitstamp in 2015. As reported at the time, employees at that Luxembourg-based bitcoin exchange fell victim to a weeks-long phishing attempt, ultimately leading to the loss of some 18,000 bitcoins.
At the heart of SpeedflyChris' analysis is this wallet, for which transactions from Bitstamp can be seen dating back to January 2015.
As SpeedflyChris notes, the address in question was used to send bitcoins to another address that later received tokens from Tether's "treasury" wallet, in a series of 21 transactions over the course of Nov. 19. Included in the alleged theft of the roughly $31 million in tethers was 5 BTC, which ended up in three separate wallets as Tether uses Omni, a bitcoin-based software protocol to effectively "tag" coins to serve different purposes.
Separately, SpeedlyChris' analysis indicates that the primary address in question is also connected to thefts that occurred at the China-based bitcoin exchange Huobi in 2015, as well as a number of transactions to peer-to-peer bitcoin exchange LocalBitcoins.
What now?
Despite the pseudonymous nature of public blockchains like bitcoin, the data offers a level of transparency into the movements of the funds involved.
Yet the absence of identifying information beyond wallet addresses means that online sleuthing has its limitations.
On the other hand, in the event of a law enforcement investigation, such data could ultimately come into play.
Source: CoinDesk
a-ads
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Before you continue, we want to make sure you understand that this is a past trade idea found inside The Price Action Club which is a premi...
-
The companies behind three blockchain platforms have unveiled a new advocacy group focusing on interoperability between disparate networks...
-
The Island Reversal Gap Chart Pattern is a commonly occurring chart pattern in the stock markets. In fact the name comes from the stock mar...
-
Chart patterns are one of the most effective trading tools for a trader. They are pure price-action, and form on the basis of underlying bu...
-
The price of bitcoin is trading above $4,000, its highest level in two weeks, a move that was backed by strong volume. via CoinDesk
-
The man behind one of the crypto industry's most popular memes speaks out on his philosophy toward cryptocurrency and its future. vi...
-
The watchdog has warned the public over a crypto investment platform that is allegedly violating securities laws in the country. via Coi...
-
BNP Paribas has partnered with Indian IT firm Tata Consultancy Services to bring blockchain's reliability to corporate event announcem...
-
Accenture Global Blockchain lead David Treat says the company wants to "work across the entire digital identity landscape" - gov...
-
US General Services Administration To Host Open Data & Accountable Government Event https://t.co/Eey0EIHCCJ @USGSA #OpenGovernment [MO...


No comments:
Post a Comment