The individual or group behind the alleged Tether attack may have been involved in a previous well-known hack in the bitcoin space.
Those behind the alleged theft of $31 million worth of Tether's US dollar-backed tokens were also involved in a high-profile hack two years ago, a cybersleuth has concluded from available blockchain data.
The company behind the dollar-backed cryptocurrency tether claimed Monday night that it had been robbed, sparking a new wave of speculation around the token, its backers and its alleged role in recent bitcoin market movements.
And, as might be expected, the availability of public blockchain data for the transactions involved led a number of observers online to trace them back in an attempt to find answers.
In posts on the r/bitcoin and r/cryptocurrency subreddits, a user going by the handle SpeedflyChris has linked the alleged Tether attack to the $5 million hack of Bitstamp in 2015. As reported at the time, employees at that Luxembourg-based bitcoin exchange fell victim to a weeks-long phishing attempt, ultimately leading to the loss of some 18,000 bitcoins.
At the heart of SpeedflyChris' analysis is this wallet, for which transactions from Bitstamp can be seen dating back to January 2015.
As SpeedflyChris notes, the address in question was used to send bitcoins to another address that later received tokens from Tether's "treasury" wallet, in a series of 21 transactions over the course of Nov. 19. Included in the alleged theft of the roughly $31 million in tethers was 5 BTC, which ended up in three separate wallets as Tether uses Omni, a bitcoin-based software protocol to effectively "tag" coins to serve different purposes.
Separately, SpeedlyChris' analysis indicates that the primary address in question is also connected to thefts that occurred at the China-based bitcoin exchange Huobi in 2015, as well as a number of transactions to peer-to-peer bitcoin exchange LocalBitcoins.
What now?
Despite the pseudonymous nature of public blockchains like bitcoin, the data offers a level of transparency into the movements of the funds involved.
Yet the absence of identifying information beyond wallet addresses means that online sleuthing has its limitations.
On the other hand, in the event of a law enforcement investigation, such data could ultimately come into play.
Source: CoinDesk
a-ads
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
AUDUSD Monthly Forex Forecast for April 2018 The Aussie is slightly trading below its yearly opening price which puts the trend on the b...
-
Derivatives provider CBOE is stepping up its praise for bitcoin ahead of an expected trading product launch. via CoinDesk
-
To reap the full benefits of digital currencies, central bankers need to consider decentralizing some authority, say the authors of a new ...
-
The "Atlantis" hard fork focuses on interoperability with ethereum and includes 10 EIPs. via CoinDesk
-
What role do charts play in Forex trading? Are they of any value? Can a retail trader use charts exclusively for trading success? These are...
-
More good news from the US: consumers were more confident in October according to the CB Consumer Confidence: a score of 125.9 points. Sep...
-
USDCHF Weekly Forex Forecast – 6th to 10th Nov 2017 Technical Outlook: The USDCHF extended its gains this week but price action was see...
-
GBPUSD Weekly Forex Forecast – 16th to 20th April 2018 The GBPUSD bullish trend made new progresses, but we’re still trading below the c...
-
The Australian dollar reached new highs and seems more confident above 0.80. Where next? Is the bull trend in tact? Here is their view, cour...
-
We’ve all heard a lot about cryptocurrencies in the news and throughout social media. With its basis as a currency created in cyber reality,...


No comments:
Post a Comment